|
Annabel, Again
Genre:
Humorous social realism (contemporary)
Ages:
9-13-ish
Synopsis
Olivia and Annabel have been best friends forever. Together, they’ve
survived kamikaze magpies, mildly deranged mothers, and an archenemy
named Summer; together, they’ve carried their netball team all the way
to the finals.
When Annabel moves away, Olivia is crushed; without Annabel, she’s
doomed to spend lunchtimes staring into the sun, and afternoons spinning
hula hoops alone in her driveway. So when Annabel walks casually back
into class a year later, Olivia can’t believe it; now everything is
going to be just like it used to be. Except that it isn’t. When Annabel
takes a seat next to Summer and invites her to join the netball team,
Olivia knows that things have changed. And that somehow, she has to find
a way to get their old friendship back, preferably one that doesn't
involve demented parental advice or books such as Journey to Your
Inner You-ness.
Annabel, Again
is a story about pistachio nuts and psychotic chickens; about maniacs
and the secret life of turtles. It’s about losing friendship, and
fighting to hold on to what you had, then finally getting it back again,
in a new and surprising shape.
Background to the Novel
The idea
for Annabel, Again came to me while walking my dog in the park
near our home. It was the middle of summer, and the lake was completely
dry. Maybe it’s because I like to run, or perhaps there’s something
about that vast, open space that appealed to me, but I suddenly imagined
a young girl running madly across that dry lake-bed. I didn’t know who
she was, or whether she was running from, or towards something, but the
image stayed with me and formed the basis for the novel. In the book,
this scene occurs towards the end, but I didn’t really know that until I
got there.
At the
time that I started writing the book, my daughter had a friend who lived
across the park from us, and I guess that formed part of the story. I
thought about two best friends who lived on opposite sides of the park
and why one of them might be running, and gradually spun everything out
from there, like a big, messy spider-web.
As the
story evolved, I realized that I was writing about female friendship,
and that this is something that I’m very interested in. I think all of
us who have been girls
have had to negotiate the often difficult and always-shifting terrain of
early female friendships. I see these kinds of negotiations beginning
for my own daughter, who was eight when I started writing the book, and
I remember finding it tough to steer a path through all that myself. So
I guess on some level I'm trying to portray a relationship that is
pushed to breaking point, by circumstance on the one hand, but also by
the stubbornness of the characters themselves, and suggest that there
are ways through, that friendship can be a tricky thing to manage, but
is worth the effort in the end.
Although
there’s nothing autobiographical about the book in terms of plot – I
never had a friend who moved away and then came back – I guess you could
say that parts of it are emotionally autobiographical. I’m sure that I
tapped into some of my own experiences in writing the interactions
between the girls, and what I’m trying to do, in part, is to suggest why
the characters might act the way they do. When we see girls interact
with each other, all that’s visible is the surface behaviour, but that
emerges, of course, from a complex network of underlying fears,
insecurities, anxieties, and so on. By adopting a first-person
perspective, and constructing a character who (I’d like to think) is
generally engaging and likeable, but who makes some rather foolish and
self-defeating choices, part of what I’m doing is trying to lay some of
that bare.
Themes Explored
*
Friendship
* Change
* Conflict Resolution/Compromise
* Communication
* Perspectives: Seeing People and Events from Different Viewpoints
* Coping with Adversity
Discussion Questions
-
The
original working title for the novel was When Annabel Adams Came
Back. Which title do you prefer, and why? How do these titles
differ in their effect on the reader?
-
What
sort of person is Livvy (Olivia)? List some words that you think
describe her personality. How would you describe her behaviour
towards the other girls – sensible, selfish, fair, mean, a combination
of these? Does she seem like someone you would like to know? Why or
why not?
-
Why
do you think that Livvy’s mother said she needed to move on and
forget Annabel? Does this seem reasonable to you?
-
What
do you think makes a friend? Do you think Livvy and Summer could
ever be friends? Livvy and Kate? Why or why not? Remember that what
brought Livvy and Annabel together in the first place was a shared
sense of difference. This sense of being different from the others
led them to become ‘exclusive’ friends, and they then effectively
stopped seeing the other girls as potential friends.
-
What
is it that brings Annabel and Livvy back together again towards the
end of the book? In what ways is their relationship likely to be
different in the future?
-
Make
a list of things that have changed over the course of the narrative.
What do you think the novel might be saying about change and how we
respond to it?
Language
and Style
-
Point of View
Annabel,
Again
is written in the first person, so that we see events from Livvy’s
perspective. How do you think this affects the way the reader sees
things in the novel (think particularly here about the ways you
described Livvy in response to the first discussion question above)?
Think about aspects of the novel and try and separate fact from
perspective. How do you think the book would be different if it
were written in the third person? Or if it was narrated by Annabel,
instead of Livvy?
-
Tense
The
novel is written in the present tense. What effect does this have on
you as a reader? How do you think the book would have been different
if it were written in the past tense? (Students might like to
consider here the sense that a book narrated in the past has already
happened, that events are set in stone, whereas a present-tense
narrative perhaps generates the illusion that the ending is
unwritten, that events are related as they take place, and that the
reader experiences them at the same time as the characters do).
3.
The
Magic of Metaphor: ‘Show, Don’t Tell’
An
instruction you’ll often hear in writing classes is ‘Show, Don’t
Tell’. By this, we mean simply that it’s often more effective to
suggest something to the reader than it is to explain it.
In Annabel, Again, I often use a form of metaphor to do this
work for me, so that the words suggest more than their literal
meaning. Consider the following examples:
* When Livvy’s mother tells her who Cazaly is,
Livvy says: ‘How can someone be totally famous one minute and the
next it’s like they never existed at all?’ (p. 105)
Is it really Cazaly that Livvy is concerned about here? What more
general anxiety is being expressed about her own situation?
*
When Livvy does her ‘dud throw’ of the stick, she says: ‘I want to
go and get it again, do a re-throw, get it right this time, but it
seems like too much effort. And like admitting I stuffed up. If I
stand here and don’t look at it, I can pretend I threw it hard and
fast, clear across the lake.’ (p. 97)
Livvy doesn’t want to admit that she’s done something badly; she
would rather ignore the facts and believe a made-up version of
events. On the surface, she's talking about throwing a stick, but
what else do you think she might be referring to here?
See
if you can come up with some other examples of how the novel uses
this sort of device. You might think about Livvy’s insistence on
retaining the same netball positions, her love of playing ‘centre’,
and her argument that people should focus on one main activity.
Class
Activities
-
Draw
a map – where do the key scenes in the novel take place? Map the
action but also the ‘emotional action’ – are these necessarily the
same thing? Think about how the park features in the novel – a lot
of action takes place there, but it’s also a kind of neutral space.
It’s what separates the girls’ houses, it’s a symbol of relative
freedom for Livvy (when she’s allowed to cross it on her own), and
it’s the site of much of the action as well as some key emotional
shifts in the novel.
-
As a
class, write the key plot-points of the novel on the board. Mark
each 'crisis point' of Livvy’s relationship with Annabel. Think
about what Livvy could have done differently at each point (e.g.
rejected her mother’s crazy fast-track plan for forgetting, been
honest with Annabel about why she didn’t go to her house with
Summer, rather than making up a story about magpies, and so on.)
-
Try
telling the story from the point of view of Annabel. Re-write or
re-imagine a single scene from the point-of-view of Annabel or
Summer.
-
Write chapter headings for selected 'sections' of the novel.
In your headings, try and suggest what happens – either emotionally
or in terms of action. See if you can limit yourself to 4-6 words
per heading!
|
|